Now that I have been using MeshMixer, I lean more towards that. However, Blender, which has great potential, allows a little better hands on editing of specific features in some way. I am looking for an open source alternative for GeoMagic, that can do alignment of 3D meshes using a fit algorithm and analyse the difference between two point clouds. The quality of your mesh most often determines what is a “good” tool and what is a “bad” tool for the task needed. I find it easier for cleaning up unwanted geometries. An already measured dataset including a point. SOmetimes it is better to close holes before remshing, sometimes not (depending on how bad the mesh is).Īll these commands in different order and combination is a n^2 thing. While Geomagic Control and Cinema 4D are commercial software, MeshLab and Blender are open source alternatives. Apart from all the segementation strategies (which is a major thing in mesh preparation from point clouds, like from CT scans and MRI etc)ĭepending on your problem, try the tools I mentioned and run FIRST remeshing (Isotropic in OpenMesher, Traingulated in Instant Meshes, Remesh (with specific edge length) in MeshMixer and se what happens. For now at least.īut as said, different tools are “best” for different operations involved in cleaning, which are numerous (just look in the manues of MeshLab the you see how many mesh repair operations there really is. Unfortunately MeshLab Server crashes, though, so I have to do these steps manually. I’d then lean back and wait until finnished. Thus no other manual interaction would be needed, other than importing the mesh to Rhino while my dedicated “CleanMeshes” GH definition is open. Empower your team by choosing the best Meshlab competitor that meets your unique business requirements. Analyze a range of top 3D Printing software that offer similar benefits at competitive prices. If MeshLab Server hadn’t be so buggy (it often crashes when executing from commandline from whithin Rhino/GH) I would perform all my cleaning and remeshing from within GrassHopper (I have a component for this). Meshlab top competitors and alternatives include Sculpteo, Onshape, Eiger, Siemens NX, GrabCAD and Divergent. I then automagically export the roughly “pre-cleaned” mesh to disk (.obj) and open it in OpenFlipper or MeshMixer (or Instant Meshes) to remesh (isotropically) and close holes. Gain: an endless number of manual steps are eliminated. If the question is “which is best”, then the question follows, “for exactly what”.Īll the mentioned tools are “best”, but on different operations.įor example, I use Rhino to automagically load messy meshes (with say 10000 stray mesh splinters) and only a few objects (most often only two) which I want to keep and further refine. 3dcoat, zbrush), however even this is imperfect and an ongoing area of research. Just remember to delete the instance mesh and Blender won't have a stroke. Some software has automatic retopology (e.g. The topology that decimate produces is generally unsuitable for any of these tasks. How does Rhino compare to Meshlab or MeshMixer or others when fixing scans of humans ? If you do not intend to pose, animate or add subdivision to your low poly, then decimate should be fine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |